Which method of viewing music should I use?
Score Exchange has two methods to display previews of music: seView which uses regular html and javascipt and the Scorch plug-in from Avid which needs to be downloaded and installed onto your computer. Both have advantages and disadvantages:
You do not need to install any additional software to use seView.
Scorch is a free plug-in from Avid for displaying and printing music. It can also play the music that you're seeing. As modern web browsers are updated, Scorch is no longer compatible with many browsers. Scorch has never been compatible with mobile devices and some web browsers on Mac computers.
If your web browser does not install Scorch automatically, you can click here to download and install scorch manually.
The static preview shows a basic image of the first page.
The interactive preview also shows a preview of the first page, but it's a bit slower to load. The preview is displayed using the Sibelius Cloud Publishing technology from Avid. With most scores, this technology will provide a higher quality preview, as well as being able to switch to full screen mode and also play the displayed music to you.
Printing after purchase
After you have purchased this item the Cloud Publishing technology is utilised to provide the printing mechanism for the music. As such, we recommend checking that the Interactive Preview displays correctly on your device before committing to a purchase.
This score is free!
This score is available free of charge. Just click the 'Download & Print' button above.
Buy this score now!
Buy this score and parts now!
You have already purchased this score. To download and print the PDF file of this score, click the 'Download & Print' button above. The purchases page in your account also shows your items available to print.
This piece for piano is dedicated to my wife Sandra in celebration of our wedding anniversary. The piece is in fantasia form. The opening theme has a Schubertian cut - it originates, with variation rather than directly, from impressions on listening to the Reliquie sonata which, in the context of my piece, is a deliberate programmatic element. From this initial seed (as well as the second theme, representing Sandra) the rest of the work is generated. My objective was to produce a substantive Romantic piece and to continue my exploration of single-movement larger scale pieces already begun with the Variations for Quartet Op. 9 and the fantasia ?From the Gilgarran Hills? Op. 10, also for quartet.
In this new piece I have tried to combine lyricism and logic, the former by increased expressive piano vocabulary (I have studied scores by Brahms, Bach, Chopin, Liszt, Schubert and Schumann as preparation for writing my music) and the latter by way of a fantasia form more tightly constructed than used by me in previous cases. As might be remembered from my quartet fantasia "From the Gilgarran Hills", the construction of such piece was deliberately less self-consistent. There were a number of new ideas and turns of material presented as a programmatic series of connected episodes. Here, I have tried something different. Basically, there are two themes: the opening in D minor and the second more flowing theme in D major representing Sandra. What I tried to do is to build the rest of the piece based on those two themes, so that the work has more unity. Even the fugato section that concludes the development has a theme that is based on the second subject of the exposition.
The whole piece is not in conventional sonata form, unless one takes this definition in the loosest possible way. There is an exposition, but the second subject is in the tonic major rather than in the relative major, and the codetta goes back to D minor to prepare for the repeat. The repeat is optional. The development combines free fantasia traversing various keys and a fugal exposition leading to a significant raise of tension and the presentation of the only "new" theme in the piece - even that derives loosely from the opening theme, however. The recapitulation is emphatically introduced and is too different from the opening material to be considered a simple reprise, as the material is significantly varied and in its impulsive mood it definitely propels the major key rather than restoring the tonic. The coda is a little section in its own right, and launches the ending of the piece in a cheerful presto mood (initial sketches had a slow, sad ending based on the opening at this point).
Overall I hope that the listener will enjoy this piece with or without the above technical considerations, especially Sandra, for whom I wrote this music.
Performance note: The repeat at the end of the expository section can be played as indicated but can also be omitted.
For anything not permitted by the above licence then you should contact the publisher first to obtain permission.
Reviews of Fantasia - Homage for piano in D minor, Op. 17
You might also like...