Full details...
page one of Scherzo

Which method of viewing music should I use?

Score Exchange has two methods to display previews of music: seView which uses regular html and javascipt and the Scorch plug-in from Avid which needs to be downloaded and installed onto your computer. Both have advantages and disadvantages:


seView, is the most compatible option. You should be able to view music on all modern web browsers including most mobile devices. Even if your device does not support javascript you should still be able to preview at least page one of the music.

You do not need to install any additional software to use seView.


Scorch is a free plug-in from Avid for displaying and printing music. It can also play the music that you're seeing. As modern web browsers are updated, Scorch is no longer compatible with many browsers. Scorch has never been compatible with mobile devices and some web browsers on Mac computers.

If your web browser does not install Scorch automatically, you can click here to download and install scorch manually.

Static preview

The static preview shows a basic image of the first page.

Interactive preview

The interactive preview also shows a preview of the first page, but it's a bit slower to load. The preview is displayed using the Sibelius Cloud Publishing technology from Avid. With most scores, this technology will provide a higher quality preview, as well as being able to switch to full screen mode and also play the displayed music to you.

Printing after purchase

After you have purchased this item the Cloud Publishing technology is utilised to provide the printing mechanism for the music. As such, we recommend checking that the Interactive Preview displays correctly on your device before committing to a purchase.

Full details

I have no idea where this piece came from. I wanted to write a scherzo for flute. I showed it to my prof on after 4 days of working on it, and he wanted it to be performed…even before he saw the piece in its entirety. (Maybe he was on crack or was desperately looking for student compositions to fill up the recital time). After 8 days of composing, here it is. Please give me some comments or feedback.

Sept. 25th - I've made a couple of changes to the flute part to make it more user-friendly. I found out that the piano part is fiendishly difficult.

Sept. 26th - Tayler's review is correct. The flute part is difficult as well. Funny enough, my flautist did amazingly well with the piece at the first rehearsal (both flute and piano did…more one than the other…the pianist didn't really look at the music)…so much that I cut the rehearsal down to 1 hr rather than 2 hrs. Nonetheless, both parts are difficult…but it can be done. Once again, I thank Tayler for his encouragement.

Sept. 29th - Yes, Sam. This IS the outcome of the dare. I knew I couldn't start it right away, but when I started it just…zoomed.

I have finally added a program to this piece. It's about how I view happiness. The 'A' section is a portrayal of the extroverted, social and flirtatious side of me. Section 'B' is all about how I usually grit my teeth when I appear to be happy…the harsh biting spiteful words that are unspoken…and there I am. Smiling…Gritting my teeth.

Oct. 4th - Dispite the tempo marking at 172, I do authorize the use of a slower tempo of somewhere between 152 - 160. If that is the case, the poco ritardando at mm.101 should be as minimal as possible. I've added a couple more things to the score…a couple of editing adjustments and a couple of ornaments for the piano. I have also decided to permit the pianist to add in a C major glissando, at his/her own discretion, at the end of the piece with the pedal down, starting on the treble A and all the way up to the top F.

Score ID
Year of composition
Difficult (Grades 7+)
3 minutes
Solo Flute + piano
Modern classical music

For anything not permitted by the above licence then you should contact the publisher first to obtain permission.

Reviews of Scherzo

Sorry, there's no reviews of this score yet. Please .

You might also like...