Fugal Impressions, Op. 9

page one of Fugal Impressions, Op. 9

Which method of viewing music should I use?

Score Exchange has two methods to display previews of music: seView which uses regular html and javascipt and the Scorch plug-in from Avid which needs to be downloaded and installed onto your computer. Both have advantages and disadvantages:

seView

seView, is the most compatible option. You should be able to view music on all modern web browsers including most mobile devices. Even if your device does not support javascript you should still be able to preview at least page one of the music.

You do not need to install any additional software to use seView.

Scorch

Scorch is a free plug-in from Avid for displaying and printing music. It can also play the music that you're seeing. As modern web browsers are updated, Scorch is no longer compatible with many browsers. Scorch has never been compatible with mobile devices and some web browsers on Mac computers.

If your web browser does not install Scorch automatically, you can click here to download and install scorch manually.

Static preview

The static preview shows a basic image of the first page.

Interactive preview

The interactive preview also shows a preview of the first page, but it's a bit slower to load. The preview is displayed using the Sibelius Cloud Publishing technology from Avid. With most scores, this technology will provide a higher quality preview, as well as being able to switch to full screen mode and also play the displayed music to you.

Printing after purchase

After you have purchased this item the Cloud Publishing technology is utilised to provide the printing mechanism for the music. As such, we recommend checking that the Interactive Preview displays correctly on your device before committing to a purchase.

Full details

This piece, commissioned by the Cobalt Duo and composed in the winter of 2017, in Birmingham, UK, is made up of a single movement in three sections or “fugues”. The first one introduces an innovation to the traditional fugal construction. The main subject is not a simple melodic line, but rather a thick melody based on a dodecaphonic series. With each note of the series, a cluster of two consecutive major seconds is set up, and then, in turn, arranged into different “inversions” that create a sense of voice-leading within the three resulting layers, which are intrinsic to the subject and can be distinguished from the contra-subjects and all the other contrapuntal lines. Despite the way these melodies are “camouflaged”, the fugal texture can be perceived in the resulting sound.

This section gives way to a second more traditional fugue, with a Lydian subject. Whilst the first fugue presented poles of attraction, but not a specific tonality, here several clearly defined tonal centres are explored, in a fugal treatment that’s much stricter from a texture standpoint. However, there’s some degree of freedom in the number of voices, and even some homophonic accompaniments appear embedded in the contrapuntal tissue. This section exploits resources of melodic development of the subject and the contra-subjects. It connects with a third and last fugue that is a briefer version of the first one, with some elements borrowed from the second one.

None of these sections is a “fugue” in the strict academic sense of the term. The overall texture is not restricted to a simple contrapuntal writing, but it goes beyond by introducing chords, homophonies, thickened melodies, etc. Neither does it keep a fixed number of voices, although it usually orbits three and four textural “parts”. However, the piece does retain the basic form of a fugue and its structural elements; moreover, it employs resources of melodic and contrapuntal development, even when the texture is laid out with a superposition of rhythmic layers rather than a superposition of melodic lines. This piece poses the idea that the elements of a fugal construction should not be limited to single-layer melodies, but it can also be carried on with almost orchestral textures.

Copyright © 2017 Daniel Cuéllar-Trujillo. All rights reserved.
This work is registered with CopyrightHouse.org. Registration ID: 2108735


Score ID
392538
Year of composition
2017
Difficulty
Difficult (Grades 7+)
Duration
10 minutes
Instrumentation
Piano four hands
Genre
Modern classical music
Licensing

For anything not permitted by the above licence then you should contact the publisher first to obtain permission.

Reviews of Fugal Impressions, Op. 9

Sorry, there's no reviews of this score yet. Please .

You might also like...